Negligence in hiring lawsuit

Negligent hiring, retention, and supervision needs to ask whether or not the employer knew or should have known the employee was unfit to perform his or her duties. Whether the employee’s particular unfitness caused the damages in question.

Employers can usually discover if someone is fit for a job by conducting a background criminal check on that prospective employee. If, after conducting a background check, an employer still extends employment to an individual shown to have a proclivity to behavior which may endanger those around him or her, the employer may be held responsible if the damages inflicted were a result of the known behavioral predisposition.

An example could be a nightclub hiring a bouncer or security to work the door or security detail and hiring an individual despite discovering a criminal conviction for theft. Should this individual go on to hurt the patron the employer may be held liable for negligence in hiring since they allowed this employee to use his violent propensities even though the employee’s criminal history was known. In this example, the employer could be held responsible for negligence in hiring even if a background check was not conducted because the employer had a reasonable duty to investigate the potential criminal history of its employee since it was allowing them access to sensitive areas.