NASA is investigating in the past what could be the first ever alleged crime in space. Astronaut Anne McClain has been accused of accessing her estranged spouse’s bank account via the internet while on board the International Space Station (she denies the accusation).

This gives rise to the question: what criminal law, if any, applies in outer space? The short answer is that, for a US astronaut aboard the International Space Station with a US alleged victim, US criminal jurisdiction applies.

The long answer is more complicated, and set to become even more so with the advent space tourism.

But that doesn’t mean the high seas and outer space are free from national laws. International law allows countries to assert jurisdiction outside their territory in several ways, including via the nationality principle, which covers crimes committed by a country’s citizens outside its borders, and the universality principle, which allows countries to prosecute anyone for serious crimes against international law, such as piracy.

So far there are no pirates in space, outside the realms of science fiction at least.

Space is governed by five key international treaties, known informally as the Outer Space Treaty, the Rescue Agreement, the Liability Convention, the Registration Convention, and the Moon Agreement (their formal names are much, much longer). All are under the auspices of the delightfully named United Nations Office of Outer Space Affairs.

The Outer Space Treaty is one of the most relevant when it comes to dealing with alleged crimes in space.

The treaty requires the exploration and use of outer space to be free, in the interests of all countries, and not subject to any claim of national sovereignty. The Moon and other bodies are to be used only for peaceful purposes. Nations are responsible for national space activities and are liable for damage caused by their space objects.

As for the question of who prosecutes space crimes, the short answer is that a spacefaring criminal would generally be subject to the law of the country of which they are a citizen, or the country aboard whose registered spacecraft the crime was committed, because the treaty grants that country authority “over any personnel thereof”.

However, the term “personnel” is not defined, and this raises questions as to what the case might be for private citizens such as, for example, an Australian space tourist flying aboard a US-registered spacecraft.

So complex.

The International Space Station (ISS) in fact has its own intergovernmental agreement, signed by the project’s partner nations, that makes express provision for nationality-based jurisdiction over crime. It says:

Canada, the European Partner States, Japan, Russia, and the United States may exercise criminal jurisdiction over personnel in or on any flight element who are their respective nationals.

As McClain is reportedly a US citizen, this means US criminal law will apply to her conduct. This is also known as “active-nationality” jurisdiction. This is made simpler by the fact that her alleged victim is also a US national.

If the victim of a crime committed on the ISS was a citizen of a different partner nation, and if the US did not provide assurance it would prosecute the perpetrator, that other nation’s criminal law would apply. This is known as “passive nationality” jurisdiction. There is also a possibility that if the crime took place in a partner nation’s section of the space station, its criminal law may apply.

For other space flights not on board the ISS, things potentially get more complicated still, for several reasons.

The treaty framework on criminal law in space relies heavily on nationality. This makes the situation more complicated if an alleged criminal is a dual citizen.

Since 2001, when Dennis Tito became the first space tourist, a total of just seven private citizens have paid to go to space. But Virgin Galactic promises “a regular schedule of spaceflights for private individuals and researchers” in the future.

Future space tourists are unlikely to be aboard the ISS, so that agreement won’t apply. It is most likely that the criminal law of the country of registration of the space plane would apply, but this could be problematic if the countries whose citizens are on board also attempt to claim jurisdiction. Be on the lookout for a Space Criminal Lawyer in the years to come. 

There is an overlap of existing business, employment, and intellectual property law as space-related investment, technology, and businesses grow and develop. But, in a largely unregulated environment, driven by profit-seeking business interests, a myriad of new legal questions arise. Criminal and civil jurisdiction; atmospheric and outer space pollution/space debris; trespass in airspace (where does sovereign airspace end and outer space begin?); property rights to outer space resources (mining minerals on asteroids, for example); and safety issues, informed consent, and liability for injuries to third parties, and the related development of an effective space tourism insurance market are just a few of the potential avenues for dispute. As an interesting aside, some observers note potential good news for the legal market: space tourists usually will be high-income earners who may be highly litigious and whose survivors can pay for high-powered lawyers.

Services that we offer

We handle deals in the aircraft, satellite, and equipment finance markets. We serve clients that include domestic and international space insurers, major aerospace companies, satellite manufacturers and operators, satellite component manufacturers, launch service providers, ground station operators, space tourism firms, and government space agencies.

• Space business planning and implementation;
• Commercial space contract drafting and negotiation and transaction completion (e.g., satellite purchase contracts, launch services agreements, transponder leases, and space asset purchase agreements);
• Space asset acquisition, space project investment, satellite financing, and legal due diligence;
• Contractual and legal risk analysis and mitigation;
• Space insurance (property, liability and other);
• International space contract dispute resolution, mediation, and arbitration/litigation (e.g., satellite purchase contracts, insurance coverage, launch agreements, and subrogation);
• Space technology exports and International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) licensing, regulation, and compliance;
• International Telecommunication Union (ITU) frequency coordination and preparing and advocating positions for ITU World Radio Conferences;
• Federal Communications Commission (FCC) licensing and regulation;
• Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) launch (orbital and suborbital) licensing, regulation, and compliance;
• International space trade, foreign investment, and bilateral agreements;
• Unidroit Space Protocol on security interests in space assets;
• Satellite navigation and GNSS liability;
• Satellite remote sensing policy, licensing, and compliance;
• Government (e.g., NASA and Air Force) contracts, including “CCDev;”
• Intergovernmental bilateral negotiations and agreements;
• Antitrust and other forms of competition law;
• Congressional legislation;
• National space policy; and
• International space treaties

Satellite and Space Technology

• Our Space and Satellite Team has knowledge in the area of the satellite and space technology industry and we can assist clients with a wide range of complex legal and technical issues associated with the satellite and space industry, including regulatory, transactional, export controls and national security, dispute resolution and liability, and legislative issues.

Overview